The tiny wall that tricked the slab model


A small nib wall can make your slab model look much better than it really is.

In one suspended slab model, the deflection was around 6 mm with the nib wall included.

But as soon as the nib wall was removed, the deflection jumped to around 20 mm.

Same slab. Same loads.
Very different result.

So what happened?

The software thought the nib wall was helping to hold the slab up.

Because of that, the slab was getting extra restraint at that location.

But was it actually?

That is the important question.

The danger is not the software.

The danger is believing the model without asking:

“Will this actually behave like that on site?”

A short nib wall may exist on the architectural plan.

But that does not always mean it can act as a reliable structural support.

Ask yourself:

Can that nib wall actually take the reaction?

Is it reinforced concrete or masonry?

Is it connected properly?

Does it continue down to proper support?

Sometimes removing the wall from the model gives a worse result.

But it may also give a more realistic result.

And in engineering, realistic beats pretty every time.

PS: Next week inside BengLab, we’re hosting a live webinar with the Inducta team on suspended concrete slab modelling and design for beginners.

If you’re already in, I’ll see you there.

If you’re not, you can join us here: https://www.skool.com/benglab/about​

Cheers,
Gabe

BEng Gabriel

I'm a structural engineer and YouTuber who loves to talk about building, construction, and engineering. Subscribe to my newsletter for easy-to-read tips and insights!

Read more from BEng Gabriel

Hey Reader I remember being pretty happy with how little my beam was deflecting. Until I realised I had forgotten about 90% of the load. Haha, true story. I was looking through AS 1170.1 recently and found an old note I had made about the self-weight of a 110 mm brick wall. It reminded me of one of my first beam designs, with a brick wall sitting on top. I ran the numbers, checked the beam, and got almost no deflection. Something felt wrong, so I went back through the calculations. Eventually...

Hey Reader When designing a building, it's easy to focus on gravity loads. Roof loads go to beams, beams transfer loads to columns, and columns transfer them to the foundations. But what happens when the wind pushes against the side of a building? How does the building resist those horizontal forces? That's where lateral stability comes in. Think about these two tables: Both tables can resist horizontal forces, but they do it differently. The table on the left relies on a single central...

Hey Reader Imagine opening a new structural engineering project and having half your preliminary design already worked out. And I’m not talking about any crazy AI automation That's what you can achieve by building a library of design aids. And it’s not just about saving time. In 1990, Mark Stewart at the University of Newcastle simulated engineers designing steel members. Using safe load tables meant fewer members came out the wrong size, and design time dropped by around 65%. So how do you...