I forgot 90% of the load on my beam


Hey Reader

I remember being pretty happy with how little my beam was deflecting.

Until I realised I had forgotten about 90% of the load. Haha, true story.

I was looking through AS 1170.1 recently and found an old note I had made about the self-weight of a 110 mm brick wall.

It reminded me of one of my first beam designs, with a brick wall sitting on top.

I ran the numbers, checked the beam, and got almost no deflection. Something felt wrong, so I went back through the calculations.

Eventually I spotted the two words I had missed in the material weight table:

PER 10 mm

I had treated 0.19 kN/m² as the weight of the entire brick wall. It was actually the value for each 10 mm of wall thickness.

For a 3 m high wall, the difference is huge:

My original calculation:

0.19 × 3 = 0.57 kN/m

Corrected calculation:

2.09 × 3 = 6.27 kN/m

That is 11 times the load I had originally used.

Luckily, 0.57 kN/m sounded far too low for a brick wall, so I kept digging. But if the number had been a little higher, I might have missed it.

Here is a brick wall reference image I keep in our BengLab Second Brain that may help you as well:

I think the real lesson is to build a feel for loads, not just learn how to calculate them.

A few rough comparisons help me do a quick sense-check:

· 1 kN is roughly the weight of a person.

· 10 kN is roughly the weight of a small car.

· 1 kPa is roughly the weight of one person spread over every square metre.

So when I see a 40 kN connection force, I picture something like four small cars hanging off that connection. It makes me think twice.

Next time you read a load table, check the units, the thickness and whether the result actually makes physical sense. Those small checks can save a lot of trouble.

Cheers,
Gabe

BEng Gabriel

I'm a structural engineer and YouTuber who loves to talk about building, construction, and engineering. Subscribe to my newsletter for easy-to-read tips and insights!

Read more from BEng Gabriel

Hey Reader When designing a building, it's easy to focus on gravity loads. Roof loads go to beams, beams transfer loads to columns, and columns transfer them to the foundations. But what happens when the wind pushes against the side of a building? How does the building resist those horizontal forces? That's where lateral stability comes in. Think about these two tables: Both tables can resist horizontal forces, but they do it differently. The table on the left relies on a single central...

Hey Reader Imagine opening a new structural engineering project and having half your preliminary design already worked out. And I’m not talking about any crazy AI automation That's what you can achieve by building a library of design aids. And it’s not just about saving time. In 1990, Mark Stewart at the University of Newcastle simulated engineers designing steel members. Using safe load tables meant fewer members came out the wrong size, and design time dropped by around 65%. So how do you...

Hey Reader In my last YT video, I showed you how a mono stringer steel stair can fail if you don’t design it properly. Torsion isn't something we deal with every day in structural engineering, particularly in buildings. In fact, we often try to design structures to avoid torsion rather than having to deal with it. Because why not? But every now and then, we come across situations where torsion is unavoidable. Whenever a load is applied eccentrically to a structural member, causing it to...