The best structural design is usually the boring one.


The best structural design is usually the boring one.

Simple. Repeated. Easy to build.

I don’t mean lazy design.

I mean you are thinking about the whole project, not just trying to make every member as small as possible.

Here are a few examples:

Line things up where you can

Sometimes the best move is to talk to the architect and shift a window slightly so your columns can line up.

Question the odd one out

If one beam, slab, footing, or connection looks much heavier than all the others, stop and ask why.

Maybe there is a good reason.

But maybe the layout can be simplified so similar parts can become similar again.

Don’t chase the lightest floor at all costs

Yes, concrete volume matters.

Yes, steel tonnage matters.

But the cheapest floor is not always the lightest floor.

A slightly thicker slab with simple, repeatable geometry can be cheaper than an ultra-thin floor with irregular shapes, complex setdowns, and changing beam depths.

Why?

Because someone has to build the formwork.

If the carpenters can reuse the same setup week after week, the job is usually faster, cleaner, and cheaper.

We are often taught to optimise every part of a design. But I prefer to zoom out and ask:

“Will this project actually work smoothly?” in the calcs, in the drawings and on site.

PS: Tonight at 6pm (Brisbane time) inside BengLab, we’re hosting a live webinar with the Inducta team on suspended concrete slab modelling and design for beginners.

If you’re already in, I’ll see you there.

If you’re not, you can join us here: https://www.skool.com/benglab/about​

Cheers,
Gabe

BEng Gabriel

I'm a structural engineer and YouTuber who loves to talk about building, construction, and engineering. Subscribe to my newsletter for easy-to-read tips and insights!

Read more from BEng Gabriel

Hey Reader I remember being pretty happy with how little my beam was deflecting. Until I realised I had forgotten about 90% of the load. Haha, true story. I was looking through AS 1170.1 recently and found an old note I had made about the self-weight of a 110 mm brick wall. It reminded me of one of my first beam designs, with a brick wall sitting on top. I ran the numbers, checked the beam, and got almost no deflection. Something felt wrong, so I went back through the calculations. Eventually...

Hey Reader When designing a building, it's easy to focus on gravity loads. Roof loads go to beams, beams transfer loads to columns, and columns transfer them to the foundations. But what happens when the wind pushes against the side of a building? How does the building resist those horizontal forces? That's where lateral stability comes in. Think about these two tables: Both tables can resist horizontal forces, but they do it differently. The table on the left relies on a single central...

Hey Reader Imagine opening a new structural engineering project and having half your preliminary design already worked out. And I’m not talking about any crazy AI automation That's what you can achieve by building a library of design aids. And it’s not just about saving time. In 1990, Mark Stewart at the University of Newcastle simulated engineers designing steel members. Using safe load tables meant fewer members came out the wrong size, and design time dropped by around 65%. So how do you...