|
Hi Reader A new mezzanine I was designing has about 54 kN coming down one of the new steel columns onto an existing warehouse slab. The easy solution would be to cut the slab and add a new footing. But before creating all that extra work, I wanted to see if the existing slab could do the job. I started by working backwards from the column reaction. Assuming 100 kPa allowable bearing pressure: Required area = 0.31 m² ≈ 560 × 560 mm Then the question becomes whether the existing slab can spread the load from the smaller base plate out to that effective area. So I checked the slab for bending, one-way shear and punching shear. It worked. But because this is an existing structure and I’m relying on a simplified model, I also cross-checked the result using the CCAA T48 industrial floor approach. Different method. Same question. Similar result. I think this is one of the more interesting parts of structural engineering. The equations themselves are often pretty simple. The harder part is deciding what needs to be checked, what assumptions you can rely on, and what needs to be verified on site. That’s also why I’ve just added a new course inside BengLab called Inside the Design Office. Instead of isolated calculations, I’ll take you through real projects and show how the whole design comes together. The first walkthrough is this mezzanine extension inside an existing tilt-up panel warehouse, including the framing decisions, existing steel checks, vibration, new beams and columns, and the slab/footing check above. If you’re already a member, you’ll find it in the BengLab Classroom under Inside the Design Office. If you’re not a member yet, you can join here: https://www.skool.com/benglab/about Cheers, Gabe |
I'm a structural engineer and YouTuber who loves to talk about building, construction, and engineering. Subscribe to my newsletter for easy-to-read tips and insights!
Hey Reader I remember being pretty happy with how little my beam was deflecting. Until I realised I had forgotten about 90% of the load. Haha, true story. I was looking through AS 1170.1 recently and found an old note I had made about the self-weight of a 110 mm brick wall. It reminded me of one of my first beam designs, with a brick wall sitting on top. I ran the numbers, checked the beam, and got almost no deflection. Something felt wrong, so I went back through the calculations. Eventually...
Hey Reader When designing a building, it's easy to focus on gravity loads. Roof loads go to beams, beams transfer loads to columns, and columns transfer them to the foundations. But what happens when the wind pushes against the side of a building? How does the building resist those horizontal forces? That's where lateral stability comes in. Think about these two tables: Both tables can resist horizontal forces, but they do it differently. The table on the left relies on a single central...
Hey Reader Imagine opening a new structural engineering project and having half your preliminary design already worked out. And I’m not talking about any crazy AI automation That's what you can achieve by building a library of design aids. And it’s not just about saving time. In 1990, Mark Stewart at the University of Newcastle simulated engineers designing steel members. Using safe load tables meant fewer members came out the wrong size, and design time dropped by around 65%. So how do you...